Run a bull vs bear debate

Desk seat: Research

The problem

One-sided research leads to overconfidence.

What the agent does

Two agents argue opposite sides, then a judge lists what's unresolved.

Copy-paste prompt

Run a structured debate about [idea]. Round 1: Bull makes 3 strongest points. Round 2: Bear rebuts and makes 3 strongest points. Round 3: each rebuts once. Then a neutral Judge lists the unresolved questions and rates evidence quality. No recommendation. Do not give buy/sell/hold advice or price targets; label facts vs. inferences and cite sources.

Works with

Grok, ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, or any similar assistant.

Linked tools

Claude: Long filings, careful devil's-advocate writing
ChatGPT: All-round role-playing of every desk agent
Seeking Alpha: Crowd-sourced bull and bear articles and transcripts

Linked roles

Devil's Advocate

Limitations

A single model arguing both sides shares the same blind spots; try two models. AI can be wrong, so verify before relying on any output.

Source

Seeking Alpha (bull and bear articles)

Educational only. Not financial advice. The Agentic Trader teaches how to organize AI agents around your own research and review process. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security or asset. We do not endorse any broker, platform, or asset. AI output can be wrong, so verify everything and make your own decisions. Trading and investing involve risk of loss.